Notice of the Judgment and Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights published in May 2025. years against the Republic of Serbia

European Court for human rights (hereinafter: the Court) is in the period from 1. to 31.Maja 2025. published 1 verdict and 5 decisions Against the Republic of Serbia.

Judgment and all decisionsbroughtisThe three-member committee.

In judgmentRaduk,The court found that the applicant was violated at the fair trial referred to in Article 6. Paragraph 1. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter: Convention) due to the lack of adequate procedural safeguards that violated the legitimacy of the entire secret surgery. The case refers to the alleged police supply of the applicant in the trap and his condemnation to receive a bribe.

Of 5 decisions made, the court is in one subject (Nafija Sinanović) Reject the petition asRatione Materiae incompatible with the provisions of the Convention. The case refers to the alleged violation of the applicant's property that demanded partial repositions, which are exempted from the possession of individual cadastral parcels to bring purpose in accordance with the bunning detailed urban plan.

In the subjectBizdar Savic, The court isdecided to complain of the applicant by Art. 3, 6. and 8. Conventions and under Article 1. Protocol No. 1 with the Convention shall be discardsbecause ofInexhausting effective domestic remedy - constitutional complaints, and complaints under Article 13. The Convention shall be dismissed asclearly unfounded. The case refers to termination of the contract for renting apartments with the applicant and the order for its eviction.

The court is likeclearly unfounded rejected the petitions in the caseJasna Negić and 2 dr, because domestic decisions that were the subject of consideration were not made Against the social / state-owned enterprise, but against private company. In the applicants, the applicants complained about the violation of the right to trial within a reasonable time and property rights.

Finally, the Court deleted the applications in 2 cases from his case listing signedFriendly settlements (BOR KOMERC doo andSM-Latex). Friendly settlements were concluded in reducing additional costs before the court and consequently less disbursements from budget funds, as it is issues that represent a well-established court practice (the so-called.WECL - Well established Case Law). Items in which a friend settlement is signed They refer to non-execution of domestic decisions made against social / state enterprises.