Judgments and Decisions

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 13. May 2025. brought, A 3. June of the same year posted the verdict in the case Selimi and Krasniqi v. Serbia, no. 20641/20 and 20644/20.The verdict unanimously brought seven-member council.Item refers tosuspensionpayoffe The so-called. Kosovo pensions from the Kosovo Branch of the Republic Pension Fund for Pension and Disability

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 28. May 2025. brought, and 19. June 2025. published a decision in the case Krstić and Pavlović v. Serbia, Br. 35246/21 and 36032/21.The decision isbroughtThe three-member committee.The case refers to the request for extradition of the applicants to the United States. The applicants, among other things, complained that their extradition

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 22. May 2025. brought, and 12. June 2025. published a decision in case M.W.against Serbia, No. 70923/17.The decision isbroughtThe three-member committee.The case refers to the complainant's complaints that did not have an effective remedy in relation to the prohibition of torture in the deportation procedure, and that the misdemeanor

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 7. Maja brought, and 28. May 2025. published a decision in caseJasna Negić and 2 others. against Serbia, No. 24582/23.The decision was made by the three-member committee.Applicants were in the application to complainand To a violation of the right to trialwithin a reasonable timereferred to in Article 6. paragraph 1. Convention for the

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is1. April 2025. passed, and 6. Maja announced the verdict in the case in the same yearRaduk v. Serbia, No. 13696/23.The verdict isdoneo The three-member committee.The case refers to the alleged police supply of the applicant in the trap and his condemnation to receive a bribe.The Court found that, although other circumstances, special

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 11. Marta 2025. brought, and 8. April announced the verdict in the case in the same yearBackovic against Serbia (No. 2), No. 47600/17.The verdict isdonelo seven-membered larger.The case refers to the alleged violation of the right to freedom of expression due to the imposition of the applicant for non-compliance with the Court in

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 1. April 2025. brought, and 9. May announced the decision in the case in the same year Božidar Savić v. Serbia, No. 11789/21.The decision is doneo The three-member committee.Item refers to termination of contracts for lease of apartments with the applicant and order for its eviction.The Court rejected the petition for the most part due to

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 25. Marta 2025. brought, and 2. May announced the decision in case of the same year Nafija Sinanović v. Serbia, No. 44957/17.The decision is doneo The three-member committee.The case refers to an alleged violation of the applicant's property requested partial annulsaj Solutions exposed to its legal predecessor from the possession of an

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 4. March 2025. brought, and 25. Marta announced the verdict in the case of the same yearBut against Serbia, No. 4662/22.The verdict is unanimouslydonelo seven-membered larger.The case refers to the extradition of the applicant Bahrain despite his claims that there will be a risk of torture, inhuman or degrading treatment and a life prison

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 25. March 2025. brought, and 24. April announced a decision in the case in the same year Milijan Kostić against Serbia, No. 40410/07.The decision is donelo seven-member.The case refers to the death of the Son of the late applicant during the service of mandatory military term, as well as an investigation into the circumstances of death

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 4. February 2025. brought, and 4. Marta announced the verdict in the case of the same yearRadanović against Serbia, No. 27794/16.The verdict isbroughtThe three-member committee.The case refers to the non-biting opportunity to the applicant to provide its comments to the Appellate Public Prosecutor's Office submitted in response to the

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: The Court) is 4. Ferbuara 2025. brought, and 4. Marta announced the judgment in the case in the same yearDavidovic against Serbia, No. 46198/18.The verdict isdoneo The three-member committee.The case refers to the delayed execution of the final judgment adopted in favor of the applicant in the process of committing custody of the child.The Court