Judgments and Decisions

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 7. Maja brought, and 28. May 2025. published a decision in caseJasna Negić and 2 others. against Serbia, No. 24582/23.The decision was made by the three-member committee.Applicants were in the application to complainand To a violation of the right to trialwithin a reasonable timereferred to in Article 6. paragraph 1. Convention for the

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is1. April 2025. passed, and 6. Maja announced the verdict in the case in the same yearRaduk v. Serbia, No. 13696/23.The verdict isdoneo The three-member committee.The case refers to the alleged police supply of the applicant in the trap and his condemnation to receive a bribe.The Court found that, although other circumstances, special

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 11. Marta 2025. brought, and 8. April announced the verdict in the case in the same yearBackovic against Serbia (No. 2), No. 47600/17.The verdict isdonelo seven-membered larger.The case refers to the alleged violation of the right to freedom of expression due to the imposition of the applicant for non-compliance with the Court in

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 1. April 2025. brought, and 9. May announced the decision in the case in the same year Božidar Savić v. Serbia, No. 11789/21.The decision is doneo The three-member committee.Item refers to termination of contracts for lease of apartments with the applicant and order for its eviction.The Court rejected the petition for the most part due to

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 25. Marta 2025. brought, and 2. May announced the decision in case of the same year Nafija Sinanović v. Serbia, No. 44957/17.The decision is doneo The three-member committee.The case refers to an alleged violation of the applicant's property requested partial annulsaj Solutions exposed to its legal predecessor from the possession of an

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 4. March 2025. brought, and 25. Marta announced the verdict in the case of the same yearBut against Serbia, No. 4662/22.The verdict is unanimouslydonelo seven-membered larger.The case refers to the extradition of the applicant Bahrain despite his claims that there will be a risk of torture, inhuman or degrading treatment and a life prison

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 25. March 2025. brought, and 24. April announced a decision in the case in the same year Milijan Kostić against Serbia, No. 40410/07.The decision is donelo seven-member.The case refers to the death of the Son of the late applicant during the service of mandatory military term, as well as an investigation into the circumstances of death

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 4. February 2025. brought, and 4. Marta announced the verdict in the case of the same yearRadanović against Serbia, No. 27794/16.The verdict isbroughtThe three-member committee.The case refers to the non-biting opportunity to the applicant to provide its comments to the Appellate Public Prosecutor's Office submitted in response to the

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: The Court) is 4. Ferbuara 2025. brought, and 4. Marta announced the judgment in the case in the same yearDavidovic against Serbia, No. 46198/18.The verdict isdoneo The three-member committee.The case refers to the delayed execution of the final judgment adopted in favor of the applicant in the process of committing custody of the child.The Court

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 27. February brought, and 20. Marta 2025. published a decision in the caseVIOLETKA Ivanova and Marina Vasilev v. Serbia, no. 16240/23 and 19610/23.The decision was made by the three-member committee.Applicant were in the application to complaine To a violation of the right to trialwithin a reasonable timereferred to in Article 6. paragraph

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 23. January 2025. brought, and 13. February announced the verdict in the case in the same year Ivić against Serbia, No. 17871/23.The verdict isunanimously broughtThe three-member committee.The applicant submitted to the court 21. April 2023. year by complaining of the violation of the right of the article6.attitude 1 Convention for the

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 4. February 2025. brought the years, and 6. Marta announced the decision in case of the same year XandYagainst Serbia, No. 25384/18.The decision is doneo The three-member committee.The case refers to the alleged unfairness of the guardianship procedure, in which guardianship is awarded S.Z. (former wife of the First Applicant and Mother of

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 21. January 2025. year brought, and 13. February of the same year announced the decision in the case Milan Pesic against Serbia, No. 4283/16.The decision is doneo The three-member committee.The case refers to the decision of the domestic court to read the testimation of witnesses in the investigative proceedings, due to the inability to

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 21. January 2025. year brought, and 13. February of the same year announced the decision in the case Almir Bilalović v. Serbia, No. 34146/20.The decision is doneo The three-member committee.The case refers to the alleged violation of the principle of legal security, which is the results of the abolition of the execution decision andde

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 3. December 2024. brought, and 14. January 2025. published a verdict in the caseLakatoš et al via Serbia, No. 43411/17.The verdict isdoneo The three-member committee.The case refers to the alleged abuse of the Fourth Applicant by the Police and the absence of any investigation in this regard, as well as the alleged unfairness of the

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 3. December 2024. brought, and 14. January 2025. published a verdict in the caseVasilev v. Serbia, No. 48150/18.The verdict isbroughtThe three-member committee.The case refers to the non-biting to the applicant to meet the reasons on which he was revoked by his weapon posture, nor to oppose them, as they were identified as confidential.The