Judgments and Decisions

On May 20, 2025, the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) rendered, and on June 24 of the same year, published its judgment in the caseAksungur and others against Serbia, no. 69080/13, 67091/14, 3997/15, 20444/15 and 23307/15.The verdict was unanimousbroughtCouncil and became legally binding on September 24, 2025.The case refers to the confiscation of cash that the applicants

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 20. May 2025. Done, and 24. June of the same year announced the verdict in the caseD.G. and SG. against Serbia, No. 61347/21.The verdict is unanimouslybrought.The case refers to the urgent temporary accommodation of the applicants, M., in foster family 2017. years and lack of regular contacts between the applicants and M., as well as on

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is3. June 2025. brought, and 24. June of the same year announced the verdict in the caseÇObentur TourİZm TİCaret Ve NakloİYat Ltd. ŞTİ. against Serbia, No. 32398/19.The verdict isbrought The three-member committee.The case refers to the confiscation of the applicant's vehicles in criminal proceedings.The Court took the position to be

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 19. June 2025. brought, and 10. July of the same year announced a decision in case Preca v. Serbia,No. 16242/23.The decision is brought The three-member committee.The applicant submitted to the Court 6. April 2023. year by complaining of the violation of the right to a fair trial referred to in a member 6. Conventionfor the protection of

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 17. June 2025. brought, and 10. July 2025. published a decision in case Ćebić against Serbia, No. 38287/21.The decision isbroughtThe three-member committee.The case refers to the rejection of the applicant for the correction of the final judgment made in civil proceedings according to its lawsuit.The court rejected the application as

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 17. June 2025. brought, and 10. July 2025. published a decision in case Lazic v. Serbia, No. 15535/23.The decision isbroughtThe three-member committee.Item refers to the process of adopting a minorX Whose foster and guardian was the applicant and the inability to contact betweenX And the applicants, and the lack of a remedy with that in a

The European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is13. passed in May 2025, and on June 3 of the same year announced the verdict in the case Zuvic against Serbia, number 3592/17.The verdict was unanimousbroughtThe Council also became legally binding on September 3, 2025.The case refers to the order of the Supreme Military Court from June 2004 to return the case against the applicant (who

On May 13, 2025, the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) rendered, and on June 3 of the same year, published its judgment in the case Nikolić against Serbia, number 21155/22.It's a verdictbroughtthree-member Board.The case relates to the alleged ill-treatment of the applicant by the police and the effectiveness of the investigation in this regard.The court assessed that the

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 13. May 2025. brought, A 3. June of the same year posted the verdict in the case Selimi and Krasniqi v. Serbia, no. 20641/20 and 20644/20.The verdict unanimously brought seven-member council.Subject se relations on suspensionpayoffe so-called.Kosovo pension to the applicants from sides Kosovske branches Republic fund for pension and

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 3. June 2025. brought, and 26. June of the same year announced the decision in the case Rating center Serbia v. Serbia, No. 15419/17.The decision isbroughtThe three-member committee.Item refers to alleged rejectiondomestic courts to initiate misdemeanor procedure, at uneven court practice on this issue and non-compliance with the

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 28. May 2025. brought, and 19. June 2025. published a decision in the case Krstić and Pavlović v. Serbia, Br. 35246/21 and 36032/21.The decision isbroughtThe three-member committee.The case refers to the request for extradition of the applicants to the United States. The applicants, among other things, complained that their extradition

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 22. May 2025. brought, and 12. June 2025. published a decision in case M.W.against Serbia, No. 70923/17.The decision isbroughtThe three-member committee.The case refers to the complainant's complaints that did not have an effective remedy in relation to the prohibition of torture in the deportation procedure, and that the misdemeanor

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 13. Maja 2025. brought, and 5. June of the same year announced a decision in the case Mladjenovic v. Serbia, No. 57776/16.The decision is brought The three-member committee.The case refers to the alleged "illegal construction" building very close to the applicant's house, as well as violations of its property rights, as well as "violations

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 7. Maja brought, and 28. May 2025. published a decision in caseJasna Negić and 2 others. against Serbia, No. 24582/23.The decision was made by the three-member committee.Applicants were in the application to complainand To a violation of the right to trialwithin a reasonable timereferred to in Article 6. paragraph 1. Convention for the

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is1. April 2025. passed, and 6. Maja announced the verdict in the case in the same yearRaduk v. Serbia, No. 13696/23.The verdict isdoneo The three-member committee.The case refers to the alleged police supply of the applicant in the trap and his condemnation to receive a bribe.The Court found that, although other circumstances, special

On March 25, 2025, the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) rendered, and on April 29 of the same year, announced its judgment in the caseLubarda and Milanov against Serbia, no. 6570/19 and 43604/19.It's a verdictbroughto three-member Board.The case refers to the failure to provide the applicants with the opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses in the misdemeanor proceedings

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 11. Marta 2025. brought, and 8. April announced the verdict in the case in the same yearBackovic against Serbia (No. 2), No. 47600/17.The verdict isdonelo seven-membered larger.The case refers to the alleged violation of the right to freedom of expression due to the imposition of the applicant for non-compliance with the Court in

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 1. April 2025. brought, and 9. May announced the decision in the case in the same year Božidar Savić v. Serbia, No. 11789/21.The decision is doneo The three-member committee.Item refers to termination of contracts for lease of apartments with the applicant and order for its eviction.The Court rejected the petition for the most part due to

On March 4, 2025, the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) rendered, and on March 25 of the same year, published its judgment in the caseBut against Serbia, number 4662/22.The verdict was unanimousbroughtlo seven-member Council.The case concerns the applicant's extradition to the Kingdom of Bahrain despite his claims that there he would be exposed to the risk of torture, inhuman

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 25. March 2025. brought, and 24. April announced a decision in the case in the same year Milijan Kostić against Serbia, No. 40410/07.The decision is donelo seven-member.The case refers to the death of the Son of the late applicant during the service of mandatory military term, as well as an investigation into the circumstances of death