Judgments and Decisions

On September 9, 2025, the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) rendered, and on October 7 of the same year, published its judgment in the caseĐorđević v. Serbia, number 11212/23.It's a verdictbroughtseven-member Council.The panel unanimously rendered a verdict regarding the violation of the right to respect for private and family life from Article 8 of the Convention, while it

On September 16, 2025, the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) issued a judgment in the case, and on October 7 of the same yearPrenca against Serbia, number 48725/12.The verdict was unanimousbrought More.The case concerns the confiscation of cash (39,500 Euros (EUR)) which the applicant tried to transfer across the state border, in violation of the relevant regulations.The

The European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is16. passed on September 2025, and on October 7 of the same year announced the verdict in the caseH.G.D..against Serbia, number 3158/20.It's a verdictbroughtthree-member Board.The case refers to the detention of the applicant in the transit zone of Belgrade Airport for a duration of 26 days and the applicant's complaints in this regard

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 9. September 2025. brought, and 30. September announced the verdict in the case in the same yearCholovic against Serbia, No. 2806/20.The verdict isbroughtThe three-member committee.The case refers to incompliance to the compensation of intangible damage to the applicant for a determined violation of the right to freedom and security.The

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 2. In September 2025. passed, and 23. September 2025. published a verdict in the caseVeskovic v. Serbia, No. 30741/22.The verdict isbroughtThe three-member committee.The case refers to the duration of the applicant's detention and the reasons given by domestic courts, which was allegedly abstract and repetitive (repetitive), as well as the

The European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is16. on September 2025, and on October 9, 2025, announced the decision in the caseRajko Grbić and others. against Serbia, number 23420/22.It's a decisionbroughtthree-member Board.The case refers to the alleged uneven practice of domestic courts in connection with awarding costs in proceedings under the Law on the Protection of the Right

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 4. September 2025. brought, and 25. September 2025. published a decision in caseM.H. against Serbia, No. 62410/17.The decision isbroughtThe three-member committee.The case refers to the alleged exposure to the applicant to the risk of treating the opposite member 3. Convention in case of return in (northern) Macedonia, as well as the risk

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 27. May and 1. July 2025. brought, and 26. August announced the verdict in the case in the same year AtanasijeRistic against Serbia, No. 38336/21.The verdict isbrought Council.The case refers to the alleged submission of the applicant against his will and binding for the hospital bed handcuffs.Also, the item refers to The unlawful

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 3. July 2025. brought, and 28. August 2025. published a decision in case A.X. against Serbia, No. 57188/16.The decision isbroughtThe three-member committee.The case refers to the alleged exposure to serious risk from the acting of the opposite member 3. Convention in the case of return to Northern Macedonia, as well as the risk of chain

On May 20, 2025, the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) rendered, and on June 24 of the same year, published its judgment in the caseAksungur and others against Serbia, no. 69080/13, 67091/14, 3997/15, 20444/15 and 23307/15.The verdict was unanimousbroughtCouncil and became legally binding on September 24, 2025.The case refers to the confiscation of cash that the applicants

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 20. May 2025. Done, and 24. June of the same year announced the verdict in the caseD.G. and SG. against Serbia, No. 61347/21.The verdict is unanimouslybrought.The case refers to the urgent temporary accommodation of the applicants, M., in foster family 2017. years and lack of regular contacts between the applicants and M., as well as on

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is3. June 2025. brought, and 24. June of the same year announced the verdict in the caseÇObentur TourİZm TİCaret Ve NakloİYat Ltd. ŞTİ. against Serbia, No. 32398/19.The verdict isbrought The three-member committee.The case refers to the confiscation of the applicant's vehicles in criminal proceedings.The Court took the position to be

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 19. June 2025. brought, and 10. July of the same year announced a decision in case Preca v. Serbia,No. 16242/23.The decision is brought The three-member committee.The applicant submitted to the Court 6. April 2023. year by complaining of the violation of the right to a fair trial referred to in a member 6. Conventionfor the protection of

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 17. June 2025. brought, and 10. July 2025. published a decision in case Ćebić against Serbia, No. 38287/21.The decision isbroughtThe three-member committee.The case refers to the rejection of the applicant for the correction of the final judgment made in civil proceedings according to its lawsuit.The court rejected the application as

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 17. June 2025. brought, and 10. July 2025. published a decision in case Lazic v. Serbia, No. 15535/23.The decision isbroughtThe three-member committee.Item refers to the process of adopting a minorX Whose foster and guardian was the applicant and the inability to contact betweenX And the applicants, and the lack of a remedy with that in a

The European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is13. passed in May 2025, and on June 3 of the same year announced the verdict in the case Zuvic against Serbia, number 3592/17.The verdict was unanimousbroughtThe Council also became legally binding on September 3, 2025.The case refers to the order of the Supreme Military Court from June 2004 to return the case against the applicant (who

On May 13, 2025, the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) rendered, and on June 3 of the same year, published its judgment in the case Nikolić against Serbia, number 21155/22.It's a verdictbroughtthree-member Board.The case relates to the alleged ill-treatment of the applicant by the police and the effectiveness of the investigation in this regard.The court assessed that the

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 13. May 2025. brought, A 3. June of the same year posted the verdict in the case Selimi and Krasniqi v. Serbia, no. 20641/20 and 20644/20.The verdict unanimously brought seven-member council.Subject se relations on suspensionpayoffe so-called.Kosovo pension to the applicants from sides Kosovske branches Republic fund for pension and

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 3. June 2025. brought, and 26. June of the same year announced the decision in the case Rating center Serbia v. Serbia, No. 15419/17.The decision isbroughtThe three-member committee.Item refers to alleged rejectiondomestic courts to initiate misdemeanor procedure, at uneven court practice on this issue and non-compliance with the

European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter: the Court) is 28. May 2025. brought, and 19. June 2025. published a decision in the case Krstić and Pavlović v. Serbia, Br. 35246/21 and 36032/21.The decision isbroughtThe three-member committee.The case refers to the request for extradition of the applicants to the United States. The applicants, among other things, complained that their extradition