Notice of judgments and decisions of the European Court of Human Rights published in April 2025. years against the Republic of Serbia

European Court for human rights (hereinafter: the Court) is In the period from 1. to 30.April 2025. published 2 judgments and 7 decisions Against the Republic of Serbia.

One verdict and one decision brought seven-member larger, and the second verdict and all remainingdecisions broughtisThe three-member committee.

In judgmentBackovic (number 2) brought by greater (by most votes - 5: 2),The Court found that there was no violation of freedom of expression from Article 10. Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms due to the request for contempt of court regarding the statements set out in the complaint to the decision of the Trial Court. The Court confirmed that there was interference on the law that was based on the legitimate of the Court's authority (because the reasons given by domestic courts were relevant and sufficient to justify mixing and because the fine was not a disproportionate goal that was Weighed).

The court is, session of the board, in the judgmentLubarda and Milan determined a violation of the rights referred to in Article 6 of para. 1. And 3. (g) of the Convention, as the applicants were not provided to cross-examine witnesses based on whose statements were made by the verdicts in misdemeanor procedures that were conducted against them due to traffic violations.

Of 7 decisions made, the court decided in a larger (Milijan Kostić) and declared the petition inadmissible and rejected because ofObvious unfoundationand because ofloss of victim status. The case refers to the death of the Son of the late applicant during the mandatory military deadline, as well as the investigation on the circumstances of death characterized as a suicide (process and material aspect of Article 2. Convention).

In the subjectZvonko Milošević, The court isHe decided to take the petition from his case from his case, because the applicant did not respond to written observations in the present deadline. Therefore, the Court concluded that the applicant had no intention of further participating in the proceedings, and that it was no longer justifiably considered by his application. In the representations, the applicant complained about the violation of the right to a fair trial for allegedly uneven court practices and the arbitrariness of domestic courts in decision-making.

Finally, the Court deleted in 5 cases of the application from the case list by accepting signedFriendly settlements (Dragan Radovanovic and 12 Dr.,Lajos Lerik and 47 Dr.,Snezana Otović, Dragan Djordjevic and 2 dr.) andunilateral declaration submitted by the Government (Radovan Korać). Friendly settlements were concluded and a sided declaration was filed in order to reduce additional costs before the court and consequently less payments from budget funds, as it is issues that represent a well established court practice (the so-called.WECL - Well established Case Law). Items in which friendly settlements were signed They refer to non-execution of domestic decisions made against social / state-owned enterprises, and the subject in which a unilateral declaration applies to treatment within the constitutional court in the procedure at the constitutional complaint that lasted 6 years and 6 months.